NOTA! Questo sito utilizza cookies e tecnologie simili .
Questo sito utilizza i cookie, anche di terze parti: cliccando su 'Approvo', proseguendo nella navigazione, effettuando lo scroll della pagina o altro tipo di interazione col sito, acconsenti all'utilizzo dei cookie. 
Per maggiori informazioni o per negare il consenso a tutti o ad alcuni cookie, consulta l'informativa.

La collana «Diritto Scienza Tecnologia/Law Science Technology» dà spazio a studi e ricerche dedicati, da un lato, all’approfondimento e alla rilettura di temi classici dell’Informatica giuridica, dall’altro, a temi di frontiera originati dall’incontro della scienza del diritto con un orizzonte di studi che va dalle scienze cognitive alle scienze della complessità, dall’informatica alle scienze sociali computazionali e alle scienze biologiche.


Sebastiano Faro (Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell’Informazione Giuridica del CNR, Firenze); Nicola Lettieri (ISFOL; Università degli Studi del Sannio, Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia Management e Metodi Quantitativi; Università degli Studi di Salerno, Dipartimento di Informatica); Carolina Perlingieri (Università degli Studi di Napoli «Federico II», Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza)

Comitato Scientifico

Edoardo Chiti (Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Dipartimento di Istituzioni linguistico-letterarie, comunicazionali e storico-giuridiche dell’Europa), Costantino Ciampi (Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell’Informazione Giuridica del CNR), Claudio Cioffi-Revilla (Center for Social Complexity, George Mason University, Fairfax, USA), Rosaria Conte (Laboratory of Agent-Based Social Simulation - Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione del CNR), Francesco Di Ciommo (LUISS Guido Carli, Dipartimento di Impresa e Management), Ernesto Fabiani (Università degli Studi del Sannio, Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia Management e Metodi Quantitativi), Andrea Federico (Università degli Studi di Salerno, Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche - Scuola di Giurisprudenza), Dino Giuli (Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione), Antonio La Spina (LUISS Guido Carli, Dipartimento di Scienze politiche), Orazio Miglino (Università degli Studi di Napoli «Federico II», Dipartimento di Studi umanistici), Michael Lehmann (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität di Monaco di Baviera; Max-Planck-Institut für Immaterialgüter- und Wettbewerbsrecht di Monaco di Baviera), Sergio Moccia (Università degli Studi di Napoli «Federico II», Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza), Jean-Pierre Nadal (Laboratoire de Physique Statistique de l’École Normale Supérieure, CNRS, Parigi), Domenico Parisi (Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione del CNR), Eugenio Picozza (Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza), Orlando Roselli (Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze Giuridiche), Giovanni Sartor (Istituto universitario europeo),Vittorio Scarano (Università degli Studi di Salerno, Dipartimento di Informatica), Antonella Tartaglia Polcini Università degli Studi del Sannio, Dipartimento di Diritto, Economia Management e Metodi Quantitativi), Klaus Troitzsch (Universität Koblenz-Landau)

Comitato di redazione

Giulia Andrighetto, Ennio Cavuoto, Oriana Clarizia, Rosario De Chiara, Valentina Punzo

Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement

Duties of Reviewers

Peer reviewers should:

  • only agree to review manuscripts for which they have the subject expertise required to carry out a proper assessment and which they can assess in a timely manner
  • respect the confidentiality of peer review and not reveal any details of a manuscript or its review, during or after the peer-review process, beyond those that are released by the journal
  • not use information obtained during the peer-review process for their own or any other

person’s or organization’sadvantage, or to disadvantage or discredit others

  • declare all potential conflicting interests, seeking advice from the journal if they are unsure

whether something constitutes a relevant interest

  • not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality,

religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors, or by commercial considerations

  • be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory and from making libellous or derogatory personal comments
  • acknowledge that peer review is largely a reciprocal endeavour and undertake to carry out their fair share of reviewing and in a timely manner
  • provide journals with personal and professional information that is accurate and a true representation of their expertise
  • recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process is considered serious misconduct

Duties of Authors

Authors should:

  • present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.
    Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
  • be able to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
  • ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  • should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable
  • should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. Information obtained privately, as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, must not be used or reported without explicit, written permission from the source. Information obtained in the course of confidential services, such as refereeing manuscripts or grant applications, must not be used without the explicit written permission of the author of the work involved in these services
  • limit authorship to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
  • clearly identify if the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use. If the work involves the use of animal or human subjects, the author should ensure that the manuscript contains a statement that all procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and that the appropriate institutional committee(s) has approved them. Authors should include a statement in the manuscript that informed consent was obtained for experimentation with human subjects. The privacy rights of human subjects must always be observed.
  • disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed
  • promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper when they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work
Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane E.S.I. SpA - Via Chiatamone 7 - 80121 - Napoli P.IVA: 00289510638 Copyright © All right reserved